Taking pictures of trains at night is a no-no, full stop. At least with night mode, it takes two flashes to judge the distance of an object with the proper flash coming later. Thats why I only take stationary trains at night. Hand shake is a factor...
Taking pictures of trains at night is a no-no, full stop. At least with night mode, it takes two flashes to judge the distance of an object with the proper flash coming later. Thats why I only take stationary trains at night. Hand shake is a factor then, everything has to be still, even people moving will ruin the shot.
Posted by Luke Gardner on Mon 19 Sep 2005 12:49:00 UTC
David Cuthbertson (DCuthbertson)
Ok. I exagerrated on my last comment but it is still moving. You can still see a bit of movement.
Posted by David Cuthbertson on Tue 16 Aug 2005 16:47:06 UTC
first
previous
Recent comments
(view all 7 comments)David Cuthbertson
Night mode on my camera is a sulpressed flash (no flash used). Same conditions as your mode, Luke, plus one other. You need to be close to the object.
Posted by David Cuthbertson on Tue 20 Sep 2005 15:46:31 UTC
Luke Gardner
| show fullshow summaryTaking pictures of trains at night is a no-no, full stop. At least with night mode, it takes two flashes to judge the distance of an object with the proper flash coming later. Thats why I only take stationary trains at night. Hand shake is a factor...
Taking pictures of trains at night is a no-no, full stop. At least with night mode, it takes two flashes to judge the distance of an object with the proper flash coming later. Thats why I only take stationary trains at night. Hand shake is a factor then, everything has to be still, even people moving will ruin the shot.
Posted by Luke Gardner on Mon 19 Sep 2005 12:49:00 UTC
David Cuthbertson (DCuthbertson)
Ok. I exagerrated on my last comment but it is still moving. You can still see a bit of movement.
Posted by David Cuthbertson on Tue 16 Aug 2005 16:47:06 UTC